Clean Yield hasn’t been the only busy bee this proxy season. According to Proxy Preview 2016, a report released this month by As You Sow, the Sustainable Investments Institute (Si2), and Proxy Impact, 370 shareholder proposals will be on corporate ballots this spring. More than half focus on climate change, corporate energy usage and political activity.
The report concludes:
- More 2016 shareholder proposals than ever before address climate change — 94 compared with 82 in 2015. Of the resolutions, 22 ask energy extractors and suppliers to detail how the warming planet will affect their operations and how they will respond if governments follow through with commitments made in the Paris climate treaty in December to keep fossil fuel assets in the ground to prevent damaging temperature increases. A further 18 resolutions focus on the risks from using hydraulic fracturing to extract energy from shale deposits, including 12 seeking methane reduction targets. Nineteen resolutions ask companies to set greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. The climate slate is rounded out by another 11 proposals that include a push to change energy reserves accounting at two companies and one suggesting executive bonuses should be linked to fossil fuel reserves accounting changes.
- Political activity accounts for another 99 resolutions, including some drawing connections between government inaction on climate change and corporations’ lobbying and election spending. Proposals on lobbying (55) exceed those about election spending (40). Nine companies face resolutions seeking oversight and disclosure of both election and lobbying expenditures. (One of the election spending proposals headed for a vote is at Alphabet (the former Google), filed by Clean Yield. In the last several months, we filed and withdrew several other political spending proposals after reaching agreement with the companies, Lincoln National, Corning and Southern Company.)
Other key Proxy Preview 2016 report findings include the following:
- At first glance, it may appear that shareholder activists have filed fewer resolutions in 2016—370 as of February 15, down from the record 433 filed at this point last year and 417 in 2014. But when 72 sustainability resolutions from the New York City pension funds asking for “proxy access” are counted, the total holds steady with earlier years. (The NYC resolutions seek the right to nominate investor-picked directors, at companies with heavy carbon footprints, low board diversity and low investor support for executive pay.)
- Companies have lodged many fewer challenges seeking to omit proposals at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) this year — 71 compared with 113 at this time in 2015. As of mid-February, the SEC had rejected 14 omission requests, leaving just 33 outstanding, half the number at this time last year (62).
- Together, environmental and sustainable governance resolutions make up 40 percent of the 2016 total, up from 39 percent in 2015. This includes two dozen resolutions about renewable energy use by utilities, with 13 seeking targets to speed the transition away from carbon-based fuels. Eleven proposals ask companies to tie executive pay to climate change or diversity metrics, underscoring the convergence between governance and broadly framed sustainability. (Clean Yield proposals at Chipotle Mexican Grill, Walgreens Boots Alliance and Discovery Communications are examples of the latter type. The report includes a section by Clean Yield’s shareholder advocacy director about these proposals.)
- How to do business in conflict zones and respect human rights is the key theme of human rights proposals, with 11 proposals inspired by the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. Another 16 ask for more general policies and risk assessments, with four saying truckers should be lookouts for human trafficking.
- The intense focus continues about who makes company decisions, emphasizing board composition and oversight. Last year’s proxy access campaign from the New York City Comptroller persuaded 70 companies to allow shareholders to nominate and run board candidates. Another 59 companies the comptroller is targeting now may join those ranks. Proponents contend democratization of the nominating process will help change companies and how they address environmental, social and governance risks. Whether this actually happens will become apparent when shareholders exercise their new rights.
The report is available at www.proxypreview.org.Tags: As You Sow Foundation, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Climate Change, corporate political contributions, Discovery Communications, executive compensation, Executive pay, Israel, proxy access, Proxy Impact, Securities and Exchange Commission, shareholder activism, shareholder advocacy, Sustainable Investments Institute, Walgreens Boots Alliance